Your competitors are scored on your prompts, on the same scan day, by the same engines. One table tells you who is winning the answer and by how much.
7-day trial, no card
Up to 15 rivals
5 on Brand, 10 on Pro, 15 on Agency, all scored on the prompts you already track.
Proposed, not guessed
Five are suggested at setup from your confirmed business profile. You keep, swap or delete any of them.
Ranked every day
The field is re-ranked on every scan, so a rival gaining on you shows up the next morning.
Not one blended number
One engine can be a two-horse race while another is wide open. Filter to one engine and the table re-ranks around it.
Visibility answers "how often am I named". Share of voice answers "of all the naming that happened, how much of it was me".
It is your mentions divided by yours plus every tracked competitor's, over the window, on the prompts and engines you have selected. It is not the sum of a column: one answer can name three of the brands you track.
The useful part is that it is zero-sum. Every point you gain, somebody in that table loses. That is the conversation your board wants to have.
For deep mud I'd look at Hoka Speedgoat, Salomon Speedcross or inov-8 Mudclaw.
Engines already have a view on who you compete with, and it is rarely the one on your slide. Names that keep turning up in your answers are surfaced with the count behind them. Add or dismiss, your call.
Each suggestion carries the number of answers it appeared in, so a real rival is easy to tell from a one-off.
You and the top five on one chart, with the rest folded into "+N more" so the lines stay readable at a glance.
Prompts are ranked by how far behind you are, not alphabetically. Beside each one, the page the engines cite for them, which is usually the whole explanation.
On the answers you lose, these are the sources the engines used. Two of them have never mentioned you.
Two are reachable today: a reply and a pitch.
Who owns which conversation, who is recommended rather than merely listed, where each engine stands, and which names are knocking on the door.
The aspect matrix read competitively: they own cushioning, you own grip and durability. That tells you which fight is worth picking.
Being named as often as a rival is not the same as being named first. Presence and order sit side by side, so you can tell which one you are losing.
Darker bar: answers where that brand was named first.
Competitor sentiment comes from the same classified mentions, so "they are ahead" can be answered with what they are ahead on.
Five points behind Hoka, and closing.
You might own Perplexity and be invisible on Gemini. An average hides that; filtering to one engine shows you where a win is cheap.
How many, who picks them, and how share of voice differs from visibility.
3 on the trial, 5 on Brand, 10 on Pro and 15 on Agency. They're scanned on your prompts, so adding one costs you no extra prompts.
Yes: add, swap or dismiss any tracked competitor at any time. Dismissed names stop being offered and stop being counted.
Visibility is how often you're named, on its own. Share of voice is your mentions divided by yours plus every tracked competitor's, so it can move even on a day your own visibility doesn't.
Yes. Competitor mentions are classified the same way as yours, so net sentiment and its trend are scored per brand, not just for you.
Names that keep appearing in your answers are surfaced as suggestions, with the number of answers behind each one: add it to start scoring it, or dismiss it.
Free 7-day trial, no card: your rivals are scored on your prompts from the first scan.
Feature
Visibility
Your score across every AI engine.
Feature
Sentiment
What AI thinks of your brand.
Feature
Competitors
Share of voice, brand by brand.
Feature
Citations
Which pages AI actually cites.
Feature
AI Traffic
GA4 + Search Console, overlaid.
Feature
Opportunities
The fix for every gap, ranked.